A recruitment strategy outlines attracting survey participants (Pit, Vo & Pyakurel, 2014). It involves identifying the specific group I intend to reach and survey and deciding on the methodology for selecting participants from my target population. This could involve random or stratified sampling, determining the approaches I will use to contact and invite potential participants to participate in my survey.
My recruitment strategy:
Based on the survey method was mentioned as a mixed approach to measuring training efficacy in the context of construction pollution; the recruitment strategy to select sample respondents for the survey will identify the population I want to survey, such as construction workers directly involved in construction activities and knowledgeable about training efficacy and construction pollution. Also, I would find potential sources to recruit my samples, such as construction companies, trade unions, industry associations, or professional networks related to the construction industry (Pit, Vo & Pyakurel, 2014).
On the other hand, I will decide whether to use random or stratified sampling. I will develop a clear and compelling message that explains the purpose of the survey, its relevance to construction workers, and the potential benefits of participation, such as incentives to encourage participation (Boeckelman, 2017). Also, I will send follow-up reminders to potential participants to increase response rates. This can be in the form of additional email invitations or personalized messages thanking individuals for their participation and emphasizing the importance of their input.
Finally, I will ensure that my recruitment strategy adheres to ethical guidelines, including obtaining informed consent from participants, maintaining confidentiality, and providing voluntary participation. I will also get ethical approvals from relevant institutions or ethics review boards.
Response rates:
Response rates commonly used in research projects can range from a few percent to over 50%, depending on the specific circumstances. It is important to note that achieving a high response rate can be challenging, and it may require careful planning, effective communication, and appropriate incentives to encourage participation. To determine an expected response rate for my survey, reviewing existing literature or studies in a similar context would be beneficial to gain insights into the typical response rates reported. Additionally, piloting the study with a small sample of participants can help gauge the initial response rate and provide an estimate for the larger-scale survey (Phillips, Reddy & Durning, 2016).
Permission survey:
Some methods to obtain permission from the orgorganization'sO or department head to conduct research include surveys and qualitative approaches, such as Identifying the approving authority and preparing a formal request letter. Request a meeting or appointment to discuss my research in detail. Provide supporting documents such as a research proposal and ethical approval. Format the letter on the organization or include my professional information. Seek endorsements or support from relevant stakeholders. Follow up to ensure receipt of the letter and schedule a meeting. Adhere to the organization's specific protocols and guidelines for obtaining research approvals (Ponto, 2015).
Doctoral Management System (DMS) and Chair:
I will postpone the following semester. So, I will enter the Doctoral Management System (DMS) and select the Chair for the following semester.
Conclusion
By implementing a comprehensive recruitment strategy that considers the target population, engages with gatekeepers, utilizes multiple channels, and offers incentives, I can increase the likelihood of obtaining a representative and diverse sample of construction workers for my survey on training efficacy and construction pollution.
References
Boeckelman, C. (2017). Everything You Need to Know About Survey Response Rates. Getfeedback.com. Retrieved from
https://www.getfeedback.com/blog/better-online-survey-response-rates/
Phillips, A. W., Reddy, S., & Durning, S. J. (2016). Improving response rates and evaluating nonresponse bias in surveys: AMEE Guide No. 102. Medical
Teacher, 38(3), 217–228. Retrieved from EBSCO multi-search.
Pit, S. W., Vo, T., & Pyakurel, S. (2014). The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's response rates–a systematic review.
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 1-14.
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and evaluating survey research. Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 6(2), 168.